The Few Who Got Away

The Watergate Scandal is still an interesting event to this day.  In 2002, I did a History Day project in 8th grade about Watergate.  It made it to the local finals, but didn’t make it to the nationals.  In the time since, however, I’ve learned a lot more that might have put me over the top.  And what I’m talking about is the few who got away.

It was not just Nixon who got away with his role in the break-ins.  Some were able to get away without a scratch of public humiliation.   Three, who I’d like to mention, are senior Nixon aides Patrick Buchanan. Antonin Scalia and Fr. John Mclaughlin.  Boy, did the loss in Vietnam accelerate the fear of the hippies whom Buchanan Scalia, and Mclaughlin had helped agitate in American society during the Nixon years. In 1972, history was made when Nixon became the first Republican President to actually win the Republican vote

Groomed as an actor in youth, Scalia was skilled at manipulating people.  To him, the hippie movement was an excellent opportunity to divide the rebellious Judeo-Christian youth who had been caught between a rock and a hard place.  Even with the large-scale Catholic youth wave that expressed empathy towards their parents Church, the memory of both John and Robert Kennedy, whom they regarded as humanist freedom fighters, was keeping them at least sympathetic to a widening, New Left-leaning evangelical-Catholic Church, with many not even knowing what the hell the New Left was.


Scalia in High School.  Even here, he could  manipulate the surrounding Power Elite to get the title role in Hamlet

Argumentative towards authority,  Pat Buchanan made a huge name for himself during his time as a student at Georgetown University by getting arrested and suspended for a year after assaulting a cop who gave him a traffic ticket.  With this experience, Buchanan could easily play on this same rebellious youth who had grown hostile towards cops, who held the authority to use brutality when needed and in some instances, thrived on it.

In 1979, Scalia found an opportunity to use Emmitt Till to unlock a now scientifically Dallas police dicta.belt which involved a different Dallas shooting. As Emmitt Til’s murder had no statute of limitations and was a civil rights crime which had a previous FBI investigation, Scalia saw great opportunity to use it to open the FBI investigation of the John Kennedy assassination. Under law, US government institutions can be investigated. Extra credit also came due to growing public distrust of the FBI following revelations of controversial investigations such as the Counter Intelligence Program (COINTELPRO),  which including wiretapping of various figures such as Civil Rights hero Martin Luther King Jr. Even though this dicta.belt could soon be discredited by a forensic investigation, the gullible general public was still unwilling to get over distrust in government altogether and many accepted it as accurate.


An ardent Nixon stooge, Buchanan over time became as many Vietnam veterans over what went wrong with the mission he undertook. This is shown in many of his writings. Note how he labeled Nixon “The One”

Although they didn’t greatly publicize their interactions, common sense rules against the possibility of Buchanan and Scalia not being closely tied.  Buchanan often dropped hints of working with Scalia, especially in his notorious Culture War speech at the 1992 Republican National Convention.  Buchanan described  “abortion on demand (a litmus test for the Supreme Court), homosexual rights, discrimination against religious schools, women in combat units”, as the biggest problems facing America.  Scalia would often rule in favor of the ideology which Buchanan brought forth in this speech throughout his time as an Associate Justice on the Supreme Court, even writing the dissident opinion in the 2003 Lawrence v. Texas ruling which struck down state sodomy laws.  In 1992, Buchanan ran an ill-fated campaign for the Republican nomination as President. Shortly after Buchanan lost, Scalia wrote an interesting dissenting opinion in the Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v Casey which succeeded Roe v. Wade when it came to determining abortion rights, invoking propaganda of the Heritage Foundation, which was founded during his time in the Nixon Administration, by stating it was against moral values that the nation was founded upon.


Pat Buchanan with even more egg on his face, well sort of. Here, he was hit with salad dressing at a speech at Western Michigan University in 2005.

Even news reporters were suckers for Scalia’s acting skills.   Sometimes he even manipulated gullible Jews, with pro-death penalty rhetoric like how European states couldn’t execute Nazi fugitives due to post-war abolition of the death penalty, relying on military courts which now no longer exist.  Even the Hague, which tried Bosnian war criminals who committed genocide, has been reluctant to consider the now unlawful death penalty.  Scalia’s definition of cruel and unusual punishment did not include torture, since to him, torture is not a punishment.  Reminds me of converters in historical religious events like the Crusades and Spanish Inquisition, where methods of torture were considered merely justifiable repentance in the eyes of God.


Here, Scalia is an overconfident University of Chicago professor in 1979. Having already gotten away with Watergate, he now sees an opportunity to use the Emmitt Till case as a loophole to reopen the JFK Assassination case and get away with dividing the Catholic vote until times stops

And speaking of converters, a third member of this few who got away has emerged: John McLaughlin. Yes, that John McLaughlin who was later PBS’s firebrand panel host of the McLaughlin Group, of whom Pat Buchanan was an occasional member. Starting out as a Jesuit priest in New England, McLaughlin ran for US Senate as a Republican in his native home of Rhode Island after switching his allegiance from the growing anti-war Democrat Party in 1970, but lost. During his failed campaign and through his own writing for ”America” the Jesuit current affairs periodical, Pat Buchanan saw potential in McLaughlin and recommended that Nixon should hire him as a speech and content writer. It was McLaughlin who wrote Nixon’s infamous speech defending the bombing of Cambodia in front of Congress in 1970.


Good allies indeed, McLaughlin was the cadre of Nixon’s Jesuit backers.

For all of the the three branches of the American democracy, judicial, executive, and legislative, each of these three Jesuit-educated Nixon cronies had a hand in keeping up Cold War conservative standards. They shed the “good Catholic” moniker. Instead, they pushed their tough Irish and Italian backgrounds to get through an often WASP hierarchy in American politics at this time.  To all of these three, morality within the White House was too hard to gamble with during the Nixon years.  It can even be argued that McLaughlin was an attempt to hold in check the Protestant pastor who Nixon’s predecessor Lyndon Johnson made the official White House pastor: Billy Graham.


In 1970, McLaughlin, originally a Democrat, changed parties and made an unsuccessful bid to represent Rhode Island in US Senate as a Republican. Despite his loss, he still remained highly active in politics. Even beyond the Nixon years, McLaughlin was skilled at using the media to keep the Catholic vote divided

As people, we often struggle, repeating our past and not learning from our past mistakes. It’s easier to rehash old events and tweak them to fit our current divide. If this is true, one can only cringe with fear knowing that a few could get away from our current Administration as well. As Billy Graham warned Nixon during his 1972 re-election that “the Synagogue of Satan…will have a strange brilliance.” Some from this “Synagogue” such as Norman Lear, Rob Reiner, and Woody Allen (whom Graham debated on national TV) have left their mark and continue to do so. In doing so, let’s hope that the few who got away stay the few.


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Decline of the American Housewife

The American housewife, to many, had long been a symbol of stability in the family. Fathers go to work and earn the family living wage.  Children go to school and learn to continue keeping the American family wheel moving.  This leaves managing the home and what’s in it to the housewife, cheerfully cow-towing to her husband’s whims and children’s needs.  Then, along came the 1960s, and like using butter-knife to cut a steak, slow movement was progressing to liberate the long-held ideology of the housewife.

At first, many New Left radicals thought they could spread their movement through the housewives, due to their involvement in PTAs, neighborhood associations, and general civic engagement, while turning away from viewpoints that fraternal organizations had.  Many also liked the potential to use the housewife’s meal preparation ability to make alternative cooking like that from Second and Third World countries, bringing worldly awareness to a meat-and-potatoes crowd, as well as the dedication the domestic duties such as clothing choices and recreational/family time to challenge fashion norms and engage in new pastimes such as the growing alternative music and movie cultures.  However, many machismo-minded males were caught unaware of how the Civil Rights movement brought about many changes, including that for women.  The medium of 1950s television would be radically challenged and changed by a new free and forward thinking class of the 1960s

Donna Stone (The Donna Reed Show}, Kathy Williams (Make Room for Daddy),  June Cleaver (Leave It To Beaver), and Margaret Anderson (Father Knows Best) would soon be replaced by Julia Baker, a widowed black single mother who works as a nurse (Julia), Mary Richards, a single working woman living on her own in the big city (The Mary Tyler Moore) , Maude Findley, a two-times divorced active housewife who had a later-in-age abortion (Maude) and Edith Bunker, a housewife who later gets a job as a part-time caretaker at The Sunshine Retirement Home (All In The Family).

Norman Lear, the creator of All In The Family and Maude, would reshape the popular both through film and television.  Norman had the far-thinking ability to change social norms, but from a progressive World World Two GI’s point of view.  His characters ranged from an interracial couple on The Jeffersons to the first transgender character, Linda Murkland on All That Glitters.  Mr Lear had had his hands in all three major Television Networks and his influence demolished taboos such as LGBT censorship and abortion.  Among his many movies, he had made a provocative film exploiting how having a housewife is a big gamble in a dysfunctional marriage, Divorce American Style. (1967) , showing the burdens of separation and with it, alimony that leads to great deprivation and possible poverty.  This motion picture comes at the end of a ten-year run of movies that brought the worst of American family issues, especially husbands from a wife’s perspective.  Movies such as No Down Payment (1957), Days of Wine and Roses (1962), Darling (1965), Who’s Afraid Virginia Woolf (1966), expressing concerns about suburban lifestyle, alcoholism, sexual mores and abortion, and long-term marriage strife, things which didn’t fit in with the post-World War II American Dream.

While these issues were brought before our eyes through television and movies, more real issues were exploding due to the Vietnam War and the counterculture it invoked among young suburbanites.  Some like to think that class division widened during this time.  However, it was actually rebellion of the free-ranging, Benjamin Spock-groomed children.  In fact, the hippies, who were overwhelmingly white and suburban-raised, merely were rebels with too many causes.  Class divides grew through both greed and self-indulgence.  Women were, with young working men going to war in Vietnam, were needed on the home-front to build up our moral and technology for the war machine.  Instead of making thermostats, women were needed to make thermonuclear bombs and as more women entered the workforce, corporate America found it convenient with more money being earned, to raise prices so more money would be spent, causing a cycle which still haunts us to this very day.  Many average Joes were joined by average Janes in not realizing how scare oil is too, and how oil companies, along with the rest of corporate America, could use this to their advantage.

Following the 1970s oil crisis, even more women were needed in the workforce for financial needs of the family.  Ways which have separated our country from much of the of the world have been through popular culture such as Soap Operas and Daytime entertainment, turning into gossip and reality shows.  By the 1980s the housewife was more aligned with the suburbs than the cities, and by 1990s, the housewife could not expand and was clearly an upper class vehicle.  The younger you drift from the wealthier Baby Boomers, the less money you seem to earn, and that has also been a major factor in why Generations X and Y have been able to preserve the dream of the American housewife.



Posted in 20th Century Women in Politics, American Life, LGBT World Politics, Popular Culture, Women and Politics | Leave a comment

Parallel PM’s ? One’s Latest Observation

Leo Varadkar, the newly appointed Taoiseach, or Prime Minister, of Ireland, reminds us of another Prime Minster of the Irish Republic, whom also had an Irish mother and a foreign-born father.  Born in the United States, this other Prime Minister had to unite a rebellious British territory, that was at war with itself, regardless of who was secular and non-secular, foreign or native, Protestant or Catholic.  This man guided a young nation through these tribulations, World War II neutrality, and served his country for over 50 years.  Born to a Spanish father and Irish mother, this man was known as Eamon de Valera.

A few days ago, the Irish Dail Eireann (lower house of Parliament) elected a new Prime Minister, who also has an Irish mother and foreign born father.  Mr Varadkar inherits new and different trials and tribulations as incoming Prime Minister.  His political platform calls for the rejection of nationalistic ideas and a more global free trade with border-less barriers to obtain this free trade.  Brexit and keeping his country’s relationship with Northern Ireland, which is still part of the UK,  are also high on his agenda.  Let us hope that are this new PM can parallel the accomplishments of founding father de Valera.  Likely, it might not and possible.

Mr Varadkar’s rhetoric suggests he simply wishes to continue the status quo started by de Valera,  who brought the offshore cottage industry in the 1957,[1]  and the previous, abeit more scandalous, Taoiseach Charles Haughey,  who capitalized on de Valera’s cozy cottage industry by putting 10 percent tax rates on major companies “hosted” in Ireland during his time in power in the 1980s. [1]  One person in America who also fuels this scandalous elite society and whom I have to see Varadkar challenge is Eolas founder Michael David Doyle.  A clever shyster, Doyle bases Eolas on Irish pride, the name even being Gaelic for both “knowledge” and “information,” and continues to a green lowercase letter akin to the app key.[2]  He originally used UC Berkeley’s Internet pioneering to pat his ego and wallet and developed himself over time into making a living as a patent troll.[3]   Can Mr Varadkar steer the Irish economy away from people such as Doyle while negotiating the tricky Brexit agreement with the U.K.?  Recent talks with Theresa May, British PM, sounded successful, but complicated.[4]  Keeping a border-less face while the UK transitions out of the European Union (EU) is very necessary while navigating through the influence and power American companies have, and what will happen to these companies when the full process of Brexit is complete.  Although Modern Ireland is around 100 years old, the nation has yet to prove to be as modern as many other European nations, even allowing same sex restricting while also restricting abortion cases to the preservation of maternal life. Mr. Varadkar’s table is set for a very challenging time.







Posted in European politics, Irish Politics, LGBT World Politics, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A Female Pope?


La Popessa.  Many are not too familiar with this name.  But it is quite possibly that this name is of incredibly great historical value in regards to the fall of the Third Reich and beyond.  She served Nuncio Eugenio Pacelli, who later became Pope Pius XII, for 41 of her 67 years serving the Catholic Church. After becoming a Sister of the Holy Cross, Mother Pascalina Lehnert began her epic odyssey.


A young Sister Pascalina Lehnart would not know the impact she would provide over the Church and the future Pope Pius XII

In 1917, Father Eugenio Pacelli was wounded by Communist Red Brigade members rioting in Munich.  A young nun, who had recently joined the Nunciature of Munich, stepped forward to administer to his wounds.  After doing this, Pacelli asked for her name and position.  She answered “my name is Pascalina Lehnart and I am with the Sisters of the Holy Cross.”  Impressed by her mannerisms and her dedication to duty at that time, when Sister Lehnart and two other nuns were assigned to assist Pacelli, who now had become the Vatican’s Nuncio (Ambassador) to Munich, with housekeeping details, Pacelli remembered what the young Sister Lehnart had done and almost immediately elevated her to the position of personal assistant, a decision that could and would change history for quite a long time.

At the age of 24 years, as a housekeeper and secretary to Pacelli, her influence was further elevated by another serious event.  It was in Munich in 1919 when a short-lived, 27 days long, Leninist state known as the Bavarian Soviet Republic was formed.  Help was needed in dismantling Leninist influence after 700 men and women were killed while fighting for the short-lived republic which existed in the Bavarian territories of the Weimar Republic.  It was at this time that Pacelli fought against the Munich occult group known as The Thule Society, which fueled the failed coup against the short-lived Bavarian Republic and also led to Pacelli and Sister Lehnart’s meeting with a charismatic ex-German corporal who had served in the Bavarian Army during World War I, Adolf Hitler.

Russian Delegates

Georgy Chicherin and Soviet delegates for 1920. This group includes five women with political status, which was against the social norm at that time. This new group of diplomatic stature gave Pacelli a new look of women in politics and likely fueled the strong bonding of the future Pope and Sister Lehnart.

Keeping with Pope Benedict XV’s wish that Pacelli work closely in getting Catholic influence back into Germany, which had weakened since the German-inspired Sack of Rome by Italian nationalists in 1870 and earning Popes from that time on the nickname “Prisoner in the Vatican” , the Nuncio opened dialogue with the Soviet Foreign Minister Georgy Chicherin, who was homosexual, and his staff, many of whom were women and very common folk.  In dealing with Minister Chicherin on matters of the Church and with Weimar Foreign Minister Ulrich von Brockdorff-Rantzau on German Catholic relations and influence with the Vatican, one wonders how working with such a diverse group of people influenced Pacelli’s views of women in advisory positions, specifically Pascalina Lehnart, also known in later time as “La Popessa”.


Nuncio Eugenio Pacelli, the future Pope Pius XII

After Pacelli, who was by now Nuncio of Berlin and basically all of Germany, advised the Vatican in 1923 on his findings of Soviet and German Church relations, the Vatican, now led by Pope Pius XI, did not agree with these findings and set up a clandestine hierarchy of bishops and priests with expressed interest of keeping the Roman Catholic Church alive in the Soviet Union.  Three years later, Michele d’Herbigny, a prominent French Jesuit whom Pacelli secretly ordained as Titular Bishop of the see of Ilium, was sent to carry out this mission for the Vatican.   Being a Titular Bishop, d’Herbigny was the leader of a Roman Catholic diocese which had no longer any existence, therefore he was a hired gun sent to resurrect a Catholic presence in the new Soviet Union, where priests and Catholic Bishops were persecuted, expelled and sometimes executed.

It was during this time that Sister Lehnart started a steady climb of influence with the future Pope, going on private visits with foreign dignitaries on behalf on the Nuncio, prepping him on her findings.  Many of these visits consisted of negotiations with Soviet and Weimar officials and through this time, a strong bond was developing between Sister Lehnart and the future Pope regarding females in advisory posts, something that was frowned upon by most of society at this point in time.

It was about this time Adolf Hitler was slowly building his influence in the dissatisfied Weimar Republic.  Knowing the gravity of the looming threat of Communism, the Vatican and Nuncio sought to use Hitler’s National Socialist Worker’s Party to undermine, harass and remove Left-leaning political parties, especially Communists. Sister Lehnart would be in charge of negotiating with Hitler over funding of his political party to achieve a Communist exit from the German political sphere.  In the 1928 election, Hitler’s party only won 12 seats.  Two years later, however, they suddenly won 107 seats and had second most members in the German Parliament.  The Reichstag was changing fast and the Vatican was pleased up to this time, only to soon regret it.

It was in 1929 that the Vatican, under the guidance of the future Pope, along with Mother Lehnart and his brother, the prominent Papal lawyer Francesco Pacelli, convinced the atheist Italian Fascist leader Benito Mussolini to give them back some sovereign territories through the Lateran Treaty.  The areas which were returned to the Papacy not only included the Vatican City, but also a small portion of areas which were once under Papal control during the existence of the Papal States.   These areas would be very crucial to the Vatican in the coming rematch between Germany and the Free World.


Joe Kennedy, pictured on the far left, is the patriarch of the Kennedy clan and ever the opportunist to establish an influx of Irish Catholics in the New England political scene. Here he meets with Cardinal Pacelli during the future Pope’s visit to The United States in 1936.

It was soon afterwards that the Nuncio was recalled to Rome to become Cardinal Secretary of State, and with him would come La Popessa. It was here that Sister Lehnart truly gained power and earned her moniker.  Traveling the world with now Cardinal Pacelli, she controlled his daily meetings, giving access to the Cardinal by some officials while blocking access of others.  During the next ten years, Sister Lehnart and Cardinal Pacelli worked in concert through the Vatican to strengthen Papal influence throughout the world, creating an understanding and a need to let people know about the Communist ideals threatening world stability.  On the Cardinal’s visit to the United States, Sister Lehnart secretly helped broker meetings with Joe Kennedy and people close to President Franklin Roosevelt.  Through these efforts, an offer was made to silence influential Catholic radio preacher Father Charles Coughlin, a strong, anti Semitic critic of President Roosevelt and whose radio sermons resembled Nazi propaganda, in return for a stronger American stance towards Communism while recognizing the Vatican as a sovereign state with an American diplomatic representative.

Not long after returning to the Vatican, the decision to back Hitler in 1929 was now starting to haunt it.  Now Mother Pascalina truly came into her own.  While the Pope was the official head of the Church, Cardinal Pacelli was now running most the operation at the Vatican.  On February 10, 1939,  Pope Pius XI died. While the Papal Conclave to announce the new Pope was gathered, La Popessa was locked in the same cell as Cardinal Pacelli, as all potential Popes are required to do before the election of a new Pope, further enhancing La Popessa’s influence in the Vatican by keeping her out of the way of the Cardinals voting for the new Pope.  On March 2, 1939, Cardinal Pacelli was elected Pope Pius XII.  Now was La Popessa’s true time to shine.


The Two Stooges, Mussolini and Hitler, overconfident and arrogant, saw themselves as the saviors of their countries and the entire world, only to see this false prophecy crumble to ashes.

While Pope Pius XII was the de jure Pope and the face of the Vatican,  Mother Pascalina worked feverishly behind the scenes to alert the outside world that Hitler had not met the Vatican’s expectations, going as far as condemning Hitler’s ethnic cleansing.   While many Catholics had long sought to convert Jews with things such as the controversial Good Friday Prayer, most Catholics had no idea what heinous atrocities Hitler was doing to the Jews in Europe and how the unpopularity of Jewish intellectuals who fueled unpopular ideas such Communism was working to his advantage to achieve greater influence in Germany.  As the American 5th Army and the British 8th Army were progressing up the Boot of Italy, the thought of Hitler wanting to sack Rome, and the Vatican with it, out of desperation to weaken morale in Catholic Italy was now clear.


Pascalina Lehnart, now known as Mother Pascalina, starts to earn her moniker as “La Popessa” by noticing how Hitler and the Fascist regimes in the heart of Catholic Europe did not meet the expectations that the Vatican had hoped for when the Holy See was aiding their cause as far back as the 1920’s.

Mother Pascalina, being the nun who was in charge of the Vatican household, would now make the decision that would save the lives of 15,000 Jews by issuing false identification papers stating that these Jews were Catholic and thus were allowed into the Vatican.  She also advised Pope Pius XII in trying to increase the Papal Guard from 575 to 4,000 to protect the Vatican and the nearby Jewish ghetto, along with Papal properties which the Pope had help bring back to Vatican control in 1929.  These properties, by the end of World War II, housed over 200,000 Jewish refugees and in this regard, the Vatican was actually helped by German Wehrmacht officers of Catholic faith.  As allied armies fought a retreating German Army, the Pope and staff refused relocation, instead staying with and bringing in as many Jews as possible.  By 1944, the tide had turned and Southern Italy, which had once brought Mussolini to power, was now helping the Allied war efforts.  It was now that Pope Pius XII turned to Mother Pascalina to head up relief organizations for Italians and, to a greater extent, Catholic throughout Europe.  La Popessa now headed the Pontifical Relief Committee, overseeing the greatest aid program in the history of the Church, eventually housing 200,000 Jews throughout the Holy City.  She also organized and led the Maggazino, a private papal charity office which employed up to 40 people.  Through these groups, La Popessa and the Vatican relief efforts which she managed continued until just after Pope Pius XII died on October 9, 1958.

Given a two day notice to leave the Vatican minutes after the internment of Pius XII, Mother Lehnart would not maintain the influence she once had, but in reading memoirs and various archives, it seems she was lifted of certain burdens that could have developed the way personal burdens are developed after world changing events.  The following year, Mother Pascalina was sent to the Pontifical North American College in Rome, serving the Church and students for ten years until 1969, when she was then given her last assignment, running the Casa Pastor Angelicus, a residential home for elderly Catholics some 134 miles north of Rome.


Now head of Casa Pastor Angelica, and without the influence she once had, Mother Pascalina meets with John Paul II. Like La Popessa, John Paul II knew the consequences of the Vatican’s mistakes in supporting anti-Jewish dictators like Hitler.  One example is how the papacy  saw the establishment of diplomatic relations between the Vatican and Israel in 1993.

Some think that women and power don’t mix.  Some think that they do. However, some are willing to compromise to get things done and to also survive in times of great crisis. It takes extraordinary valor and courage to make these difficult, life-or-death decisions, compromising one’s principals of thought.  Among the Catholics at the time, nuns represented the gender role of house-mothers, held down to do menial tasks of nursery, cooking and teaching, whilst priests benefited with a rising hierarchy and the potential to become the Pope.  Mother Pascalina, “La Popessa,” broke molds in a great crisis for the Church and Vatican, benefiting from a more open-minded Nuncio, Cardinal and Pope, Eugenio Pacelli.   We can only hope our current Pope Francis will provide the same influence and acceptance of women of the church like how Nuncio Pacelli had given Mother Lehnart, “La Popessa.”



Bibliography and Sources

Book: Pius XII, Hound of Hitler, Gerard Noel

Book: The Diplomats 1919-1939, Gordon Craig, Felix Gilbert

Book: His Humble Servant, Autobiographical Notes recorded by Susan Johnson

Book: La Popessa, Paul Murphy

Book: Hitler’s Pope, John Cromwell

Website: Institute of Religion and Public Life-First Things-Pope Pius XII

Website: La

Website: Find a Grave-Sr Pascalina Josefina Lehnert

Website: Catholic Journal- Pope Pius XII’s “Silent” War

Photos: Getty Images, Photo Buckets, Stewards Blog, History, Ambrosius007

Posted in 20th Century Women in Politics, European politics, Women and Politics, Women Behind Powerful Men, Women in Papal History, Women of the Catholic Church | Leave a comment

Satan’s Pediatrician, 2017 Edition

What makes society so rebellious? Many traditionalists like to blame the popular culture.  A lot of anti-secularists feel it is the pursuit of proving whether or not Alfred Kinsey’s absurd theory of sexuality was right.  However, simple research proves that this is not the case.  It all goes back to a book which galvanized the baby boomer’s rebellious culture identity and the lack of parenting which followed among future generations.

Benjamin Spock, the son of a wealthy lawyer who served as general counsel to the New Haven railroad, became obsessed with Sigmund Freud at a young age.   Seeing the impact the John B. Watson’s rigid, Puritanical-like pediatrics, such as no hugging, no sympathy, doctor-knows-best, parents-know-little, whereas the overly-strict childhood Spock endured would change his views and the views of millions of parents worldwide who read Spock’s book.  The Puritanical ideology which Spock’s parents followed  was indeed overbearing and many of the Puritans during colonial days were willing to hang people and torture with stone pressing if mere allegations of witchcraft surfaced.  Spock was just as Puritanical in his pseudo-expertise on what was and was not good for children, how they are raised, and the outcome of the child’s ability to mature.  The generation gap, which was common amongst boomers, also lead to his own desire to end the cycle of overbearing parenting, which fueled his own generation gap as well.

Interested in Freudian concepts, Spock saw dollar signs when he saw fit to revise his book, ”The Common Sense of Baby and Child Care”, four times over,  changing its meaning and concept to fit the changing times.  By the time he wrote his fifth through eighth editions, however, Spock needed help writing these books because he had lost touch with initial meaning of what the book was.  Hypocrisy was even shown by the fact that even his own two sons were bitter towards him throughout much of their lives because of his own bad parenting.  In essence, Spock fooled us all, like a sideshow barker at a county fair, selling his medicine to unwary customers who were willing to buy into this new type of hype.  The end of World War II saw the rise of the desire to bring up children and find peace, which was a vehicle for Spock to sell his rebellion, which sold the souls of millions of children to the ways of anarchy and unorganized rebellion.  Henceforth, the moniker “Satan’s Pediatrician.”




Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

A Tale of Two Preachers: Revisited

When I was in school, I was taught that Martin Luther King Jr.’s role model was Mahatma Gandhi.  Judging by the way he helped organize the Montgomery Bus Boycott, many have thought he was   It turns out I was deceived.  King’s chief weapon was not civil disobedience, but rather preaching.  King’s chief inspiration was also not at all Gandhi, but both his father and close friend Billy Graham.  The two had in fact met during the Montgomery boycott.[1]  Learning this makes me wonder what the main purpose of the boycott truly was.

Two years later in 1957, King played a vital role in a summer-long Graham crusade in New York City.  In fact, Graham even assigned two of King’s clerical compatriots, Thomas Kilgore and Gardner Taylor, when the crusade began in the month of May.[1]  As the crusade progressed into July,  Graham publicly denounced segregation when he preached from the steps of Sandy Ray’s Cornerstone Baptist Church and called for anti-segregation legislation; Ray was an African American who became Martin Luther King Sr.’s closest friend when they both attended Morehouse College in Atlanta.[2]  On July 18, Graham further enhanced this message when he invited King to speak onstage during an event at Madison Square Garden.[1]  As Rick Blaine famously claimed at the end of Casablanca, “I think this is the beginning of a beautiful friendship.”

The preachers in action

A beginning of a beautiful friendship

Though groups like the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE) and the Student Nonviolent Coordination Committee (SNCC) and had participated in actions such as sit-ins and Freedom Rides, the amount of civil disobedience which Dr King’s organization, the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC), participated in did not even escalate until the Kennedy Administration.  The Albany Movement, which was centered in Albany, Georgia and took place soon after the Freedom Rides ended in 1961, was widely acknowledged as the SCLC’s first major nonviolent campaign for civil rights and was the prototype for the event which pressured President Kennedy to publicly, though not privately, push for Civil Rights, the Birmingham Children’s Crusade.  However, the Albany Movement was organized by SNCC. Though the SCLC had organized the infamous Birmingham Children’s Crusade where Birmingham police chief Eugene “Bull” Connor ordered his police to unleash powerful water hoses and attack dogs against the children protesting segregation in the city, it was because Dr King had assigned an unruly Freedom Rider named James Bevel to do so.  Dr King was clearly not at all a man of civil disobedience, but rather a man of Protestant faith who was loyal to the name his father gave him and sought to advance civil rights by weakening Kennedy’s Catholicism.  During Kennedy’s President, Graham acted as King’s bailer during both the Albany[3} and Birmingham campaigns.[4]

Contrary to what many think, King declined to endorse either Kennedy or Nixon during the 1960 election. [5] Despite early concerns, the FBI did not regard King as a promoter of Communist propaganda until 1962, a time when they were supervised by none other than US Attorney General Robert Kennedy.[6]   After all, it is no surprise why Michael King Sr. decided to unofficially change his and his son’s name to Martin Luther in 1934.

King Sr. was an influential Baptist preacher who had been dubbed “the best paid Negro minister in Atlanta” and had enough influence to join ten other pastors in 1934 for a trip to the Holy Land and Europe, which included a visit to Berlin, Germany, where the Fifth Baptist World Alliance Congress was being held, despite the fact that the country was now ruled by the esteemed white supremacist Adolf Hitler.  It was here that King Sr. learned about German Protestant reformer Martin Luther and his Ninety-Five Theses. [7] Despite the fact that the conference also had 30 black pastors, sympathy for Nazi Germany ran at the convention and was a very troubling experience for King Sr.[8]  Over time, King Sr. grew closer and closer to the ideas of Luther and by 1957, the names of both the father and son were legally changed from Michael to Martin Luther.[8]

Billy Graham, a Southern Democrat who supported Nixon and was especially close to Kennedy’s Vice President Lyndon Johnson, had dedicated his life to eliminating the two things which he felt were obstructing progress in the South: Segregation and Communism.  His method of enhancing civil rights came from using the Cold War consensus to put both anti-Communist segregationists and civil rights activists in the same room.

Despite his Southern upbringing, Graham experienced a major case of enlightenment while attending Bob Jones University.  While there, Graham had become dissatisfied with the school’s fundamentalist interpretation of the bible.[9]  He soon decided to end his time as a student at Bob Jones University after just one semester and went to Tampa, Florida to enroll at the Florida Bible Institute.[9]  Along with his interest for preaching the word on Jesus, Graham also decided to study anthropology and went to Wheaton College, a small, conservative liberal arts school west of Chicago, in 1940, just one year after he was formally ordained as a Southern Baptist minister.[9]  At Wheaton, Graham would have African American socials peers for the first time in his life and became relatively progressive for someone who was raised in a white, southern environment.[10][11]

Some like to claim that Graham’s decision to have segregationist Texas Governor Price Daniel introduce him during a crusade in San Antonio in 1958 signaled a shift in King’s views of Graham.  However , what it mainly did was dash King’s ambitions of holding crusades with Graham in the Southern states.[12]  Being enlightened from his experience in Nazi Berlin, King Sr. realized there was a major opportunity to advance the cause of Civil Rights in the anti-Catholic Southern states.



As tensions were rising in the America in the 1960s of the Civil Rights Movement, The Vietnam War, and the schism between The Establishment and the younger generation, a new peaceful voice was need to promote inter-religious unity. King and Rabbi Heschel, with support of many other religious leaders, sought to forge the alliance that was needed to quell tensions amongst all Americans, young and old, black and white, Christian and Jew

The strategy of King Sr was to enlighten Catholics into secular thinking, and keep the South a strongly Baptist region, to advance the cause of Civil Rights.  Things, however, turned differently when not only Catholics, but Jews and other religious groups took up the banner of Civil Rights put forward by both Kings, Jr. and Sr.  King Jr.  also spoke at the Beth Emet Free Synagogue in Evanston, Illinois in 1958[13] and five years later, he and Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel, unknowingly, both used the same passage from the Prophet Amos to bring their points of view into focus, which lead to a brief first meeting at the National Conference on Religion and Race which took place in Chicago on January 14, 1963.[14]  Ten months later, the beginning of major collaboration between the two started at the United Synagogue of America’s Golden Jubilee Convention in New York on November 19.[15]  Heschel would stand alongside King during the iconic March from Selma to Montgomery which took place in March of 1965[15] and also accompanied him when he gave the infamous Beyond Vietnam anti-war speech in New York City’s Riverside Church on April 4, 1967 as well.[16]   Through Graham, black and whites of different denominations were starting to work together on Civil Rights.  King brought Jews and even more diverse denominations into the struggle for those same Civil Rights.  The tale of these two preachers is extraordinary and a cornerstone of our country’s movement towards not only Civil Rights, but human rights.








4. Long, Michael G. ed (2008), ”The Legacy of Billy Graham: Critical Reflections on America’s Greatest Evangelist”, pp. 150–151.













Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Sacrificial Lamb and The Needed President


While many consider the Kennedy Assassination to be a tragedy, I consider it to be both a tragedy and evidence of God.  It is true that John F. Kennedy came from a Catholic family which was discriminated from joining elitist clubs that were limited to blue bloods-better known as Boston Brahmins- and was willing to embrace the idea of Civil Rights on a limited basis.  However, he was also reluctant to lose the Southern vote and only proposed the Civil Rights Act in June of 1963 because he felt the violence which was shown during the Birmingham protests would’ve created more political damage which already stemmed from his failures to contain Fidel Castro.  The manner which he proposed the law, which would’ve allowed the Attorney General to strongly enforce desegregation, also caught him off guard, as the racism which still persisted couldn’t guarantee this for small businesses.  Lyndon Johnson, on the other hand, was a greater champion of Civil Rights who had grown up in poverty and had worked with a group of people who are still one of the biggest racial minorities in Texas to this day, Mexican immigrants.  Unlike Kennedy, Johnson’s time in the Senate also made him an accomplished politician.

LBJ had served as Senate Majority leader and knew how to outmaneuver the Southern Bloc leader who lead the filibuster of the act, Richard Russell [1]. Johnson also sought to use Civil Rights to advance his War on Poverty, which was popular even among poor white Southern segregationists.  With the help of Illinois Republican Senator Everett Dirksen and Senate Majority Whip Hubert Humphrey, Johnson was able to defeat the Southern Bloc by pushing an altered version of Kennedy’s mismanaged proposal of the law.   Dirksen presented a compromise which gave state and local governments more power to enforce desegregation of private business and only allowed federal intervention on this matter if it were proven that state and local governments were too exhausted to comply [2].  On May 26, Humphrey allowed Dirksen to introduce this compromise bill and the tough challenge of seeing the law pass in the Senate was accomplished on June 19.  The law then easily passed the House of Representatives on June 2 and was signed into law by LBJ on the very same day.

Many SNCC and SDS activists have long argued that the violence which showed during the 1964 Mississippi Freedom Summer Campaign and the President’s decision to allow delegates from Mississippi’s segregated Democrat party to represent the 1964 Democratic National Convention resulted in the President caving into pressure from the Selma campaign and only push for voting rights out of fear for his political future.  However, a taped telephone conversion between Johnson and Martin Luther King Jr. on January 15, 1965 proves otherwise[3].  As revealed in this conversation, Johnson wanted MLK to push the voting rights campaign so it would go beyond just voting rights and advance the War on Poverty.  The President had also made clear in his 1964 State of the Union speech that the War on Poverty could only succeed as a result of teamwork from the federal, state and local government, which was also the reason why he didn’t want to risk losing support southern segregationists by allowing the SNCC’s Mississippi Freedom Democratic Freedom Party to represent Mississippi at the 1964 DNC.

Had JFK lived, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 would’ve never been passed and War on Poverty measures such as Head Start, Food Stamps, Medicare and Medicaid would have never been passed either.  Many myths and Tall Tales have long persisted about what John Kennedy and his brother Robert had done for the Civil Rights Movement.  In fact, it wasn’t until February of 1962, just one year into the Kennedy Administration, when the FBI decided to take a good look into the Martin Luther King and the SCLC.[4]  Around this time, King was attempting to build on the success of the Freedom Rides with the Albany Movement.  However, US Attorney General Robert Kennedy at this time allowed the FBI- which he supervised- to investigate King’s close advisor Stanley Levinson.[4]  In October of 1963- four months after the Birmingham campaign pressured JFK to push for Civil Rights and just one month before JFK was assassinated- Robert showed even greater disregard for Civil Rights by allowing the FBI to wiretap King and other SCLC members.[4]

Despite mentioning the issues of poverty and civil rights his ”New Frontier” speech at the the 1960 Democratic National Convention, The Kennedy Presidential agenda was not at all focused on the broad picture of Civil Rights.  He had voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1957 while in the Senate and later sent Robert to bailed King out of jail following an arrest at an Atlanta sit-in in 1960, but King declined to endorse the Kennedy campaign.[6] In fact, the person who would bail King out of during the Kennedy Administration was no longer the Kennedys, but rather America’s Pastor and King’s close friend Billy Graham.[7]  The best effort by the Kennedy Administration at pushing for Civil Rights occurred in 1962, when President Kennedy sent federal troops to Oxford, Mississippi, to quell riots at the University of Mississippi following its integration by James Meredith and created the Voter Education Project (VEP).[6]   JFK, however, put little effort into funding VEP and even threatened to expel the SCLC from VEP in 1963.[6]   Hence, Kennedy was the Sacrificial Lamb and Johnson was the needed President


2. []

3. []

4.ibid []

5. []

6. ibid []

7. []


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

I Laugh At You, You Stupid Jackass

It’s only been proven that PART of Josephus’ writing was tampered with. The fact is atheism and GOP conservatism are mental impairments that have yet to be recognized by the masses

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Hello world!

Welcome to This is your first post. Edit or delete it and start blogging!

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment